Law firm operations
SideEye Labs maps your intake, follow-up, matter setup, document handoff, and reporting workflow, then fixes the fastest expensive leak using the tools you already have.
No confidential client details needed for the first diagnostic.
Workflow leak map
Choose the fastest path
Use this when price/value is the open question. It turns stale leads and matter value into rough monthly recovery math.
Calculate leak valueUse this when the workflow feels messy but the revenue impact is unclear. Score one workflow without sharing confidential details.
Score one workflowUse this before buying a diagnostic. The sample shows the map, leak scorecard, fix backlog, and sprint recommendation.
View sample reportUse this when the firm already believes the leak is real and needs to understand what the $1,500-$3,000 sprint actually changes.
View fix planEach leak point gets a simple score: 0 means invisible, 1 means manual and inconsistent, 3 means tracked but still checked by hand, and 5 means visible, owned, and mostly automated.
Use the interactive scorecardEstimate intake leakUse the printable scorecardDownload PDF versionView sample diagnostic reportFind the lowest-scoring section with the highest revenue or staff-time impact. Fix that first.
Find the lowest-scoring section with the highest revenue or staff-time impact. Fix that first.
Find the lowest-scoring section with the highest revenue or staff-time impact. Fix that first.
Find the lowest-scoring section with the highest revenue or staff-time impact. Fix that first.
Find the lowest-scoring section with the highest revenue or staff-time impact. Fix that first.
15 minutes
Walk through one generic workflow without confidential client details. Leave with the likely leak and the best next step.
$300-$500
Get a workflow map, leak list, quick-win backlog, and a go/no-go recommendation for a fix sprint.
$1,500-$3,000
Implement one or two low-risk workflow fixes using your existing tools where possible, then hand over the SOP and rollback note.
Practice pages
Personal injury firms can lose value before a matter is even opened: missed intake calls, slow follow-up, incomplete documents, medical-record chasing, and unclear case-status updates. The audit finds where ownership drops between intake, staff, attorneys, and existing tools.
View practice pageImmigration work creates heavy checklist and deadline pressure. The audit focuses on intake fit, document packets, client reminders, deadline visibility, and staff handoffs without asking for sensitive personal facts in the first teardown.
View practice pageFamily law workflows often carry urgency, emotion, and sensitive context. The first teardown stays generic: it looks at consultation follow-up, document handoff, message routing, and internal visibility without collecting client facts.
View practice pageBest fit: small and mid-sized firms using tools like Clio, Clio Grow, Lawmatics, Zapier, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Ruby, Smith.ai, or similar systems.
Not for legal advice, replacing your practice-management system, speculative AI strategy, or handling confidential client data before a proper engagement.
If you want to self-score first, use the printable checklist and send back only the lowest-scoring section. That is enough for a useful first teardown.
If you want to see the paid diagnostic shape before replying, the sample report shows the workflow map, leak scorecard, fix backlog, and sprint recommendation using a fictional workflow.
Score one workflowEstimate intake leakView sample reportOpen printable checklistDownload PDF checklistStart with one workflow