Family law firms
Family law workflows often carry urgency, emotion, and sensitive context. The first teardown stays generic: it looks at consultation follow-up, document handoff, message routing, and internal visibility without collecting client facts.
First teardown stays generic: no client names, matter facts, legal strategy, privileged material, documents, or credentials.
Example workflow
Consultation request -> scheduling -> retainer follow-up -> document request -> message routing -> weekly owner review
Best fit: Family law firms where consultations, retainers, document requests, and client messages create repeated staff follow-up work.
What usually leaks
Symptom: Potential clients complete a consultation, but the next retainer or decline step lives in notes or memory.
First fix to test: Use one consultation follow-up status with next date, owner, template, and close/no-close outcome.
Symptom: Client messages arrive through multiple channels and staff spend time deciding who should respond.
First fix to test: Define routing rules for one common message type with owner, response SLA, and escalation note.
Symptom: Partners cannot quickly see stuck intake, document, or follow-up items without asking staff.
First fix to test: Create one weekly exception view for aged follow-ups, missing documents, and ownerless items.
Paid path
15 minutes
Send one generic workflow and get the most likely first leak.
$300-$500
Get a written map, leak score, quick-win backlog, and sprint go/no-go.
$1,500-$3,000
Implement one or two low-risk workflow fixes with existing tools where possible.
Use the scorecard if you want to self-check one workflow first. Use the request page if you want SideEye Labs to tear down one generic law-firm handoff.